
Picture provided by:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.txstickerco.com/images/Texas%2520Flags/Texas%2520Flag%2520FRONT.PNG&imgrefurl=http://www.txstickerco.com/&h=268&w=428&sz=77&tbnid=R-0yWlmiGUE2VM:&tbnh=76&tbnw=122&hl=en&start=5&prev=/images%3Fq%
Table of Contents
1. Scenario 1:
Day of Destruction: Scenario 2: Miss America Succeeds in World
Peace.
2. Domain Summery
3. Summery of The Postman
4. Analyzing The Postman
5. Life after The Postman
6. Prevention of The Postman
Scenario: 1
Day of Destruction part 2
Everything
in the future is based on what occurs in the present. If the nations of the
world continue with the creation of more destructive weapons of mass
destruction, the future could be tragic for the generations to come.
In the case that nonproliferation of nuclear weapons fails and the world does
go into nuclear warfare then the environment, the economy, and politics will
change for the worse. Not only would the American Government have to try to
stabilize our economy, government, and the natural environment, they would have
to try to calm the American people and access the situation at hand.
Scenario – A terrorist
organization has acquired several nuclear bombs and has planted them in largely
populated areas in the United States. Suddenly and without warning these atomic
bombs detonate leaving the largest Cities in the U.S. leveled. The American
Government is forced to take action, but how can the government take action if
most of them are dead?
In
This scenario there isn’t much to say the bombs go off we all die unless we get
our own Postman.
Images provided
by:
http://images.google.com/images?q=Nuclear+explosion&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&start=40&sa=N
Scenario: 2
Miss America Succeeds in
world peace
Once
again everything in the future is based on what occurs in the present. If the
nations of the world cease the creation of more destructive weapons of mass
destruction, the future could be beautiful for the generations to come.
In the case that nonproliferation of nuclear weapons succeed and the world
doesn’t go into nuclear warfare then the environment, the economy, and politics
will change for the better. Not only would the American Government have
complete control over everything American but also the Worlds people will be at
peace.
Scenario- All governments are mended and sitting down to an
afternoon conference and one of our officials decides “nuke’s,” are overrated
and its time to get rid of all dangers connected to these weapons. After the
I’s are dotted and the T’s crosses our nuclear weapons are submerged to live
with the beetles. The production
ends leaving a cleaner friendlier environment.
What’s
trying to be said here is : getting rid of our nuclear weapons would create a
cleaner more people friendly environment rid of fear and setup for generations
to come.
images provided
by:
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=flower
images provided by:
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=globe
Everything
in the future is based on what occurs in the present. If the nations of the
world continue with the creation of more destructive weapons of mass
destruction, the future could be tragic for the generations to come.
In the case that nonproliferation of nuclear weapons fails and the world does
go into nuclear warfare then the environment, the economy, and politics will
change for the worse.
Environmental
Impact 
The environment is extremely fragile. Let’s say that a country completely
devastates a landmass where certain species of plant grows and that plant is
unique to that land mass and that land mass only. If it is completely destroyed
by this nuclear holocaust then a link in the food chain is gone. If this link
is wiped out, then the next link is without a food source, then it is wiped
out, and so on and so forth. Plants and animals supply our oxygen and food, so
if we are able to shelter ourselves from the nuclear holocaust, we could not
survive long without our natural environment.
Economic
Growth 
A nuclear conflict would also have a great impact on the global economy. In the
event of a nuclear attack the global economy would go into a tailspin. The
destruction of a major city could destroy entire industries. The loss of a big
profile city such as New York or Tokyo would mean the loss of thousands of
workers and necessary facilities required for an effective economy. The loss of
the Twin Towers is an example of how a catastrophe like this could affect the
economy. America was thrown into a recession and the stock market was heavily
damaged. Hurricane Katrina and striking the southern cost is another example of
a catastrophe damaging the economy. These events however, would be small scale
when compared to a nuclear war. Nuclear fallout alone is enough to prevent any
recovery efforts. In the event the wheat belt was to be struck in a nuclear
explosion, or the Silicon Valley, these sectors of the American economy would
be plunged down the drain. As it is known, this would simply create a domino
effect on other sectors of the economy. Not only would this happen in the
United States, but all over the world.
Throughout the Cold War both sides were afraid the other side would “pull the trigger” first and the result would be nuclear war. In the event that a nuclear catastrophe took place, the countries, which were hardest hit, would suffer a serious political setback in the terms of anarchy. For example, if the United States were to be hit in the Northern, Western, Southern, and Eastern areas, there would be those trying to gain power and take advantage of the power vacuum created. Yes it would seem logical that any military would be put in charge if any world leaders were to be killed, yet it could be possible that these militaries would not loose their strongholds on a certain country’s government. As history shows us, once a national disaster (such as the invading Mongols or other barbarians) took place, the resulting event was feuding warlords. As you could see in the current news, once Saddam Hussein was removed, the Shiites and Sunni religious groups began to fight for control of the government.
Images provided by: http://images.google.com/images?q=flag&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=
Pictures
provided by: http://images.google.com/images?q=the+postman&hl=en
In 2013
civilization is on the verge of destruction. A war decimated the government and
just about all of the population in the United States (possibly the world)
citizens struggle to remain alive fighting starvation and rogue groups of armed
men. One scoundrel group called the Holnists. This group is the largest and their
leader, General Bethlehem, has delusions of ruling the country. A drifter
A.K.A: Kevin Costner, is captured by the Holnists and forced to join. He
escapes at the very first chance and ends up in a mail jeep with an anonymous
skeleton. The skeleton is wearing a postal uniform which of course he takes to
keep warm, with this uniform comes a mailbag which of course contains old mail
which our hero decides to con people with. The Postman realizes the amount of
hope the people have and decides its time for his plans to change. Our hero has found his villain, The
Holnists.
Images provided
by: http://images.google.com/images?q=envelope&hl=en
There
are two ways that you can look at Kevin Costner's The Postman (not to be confused with the former Oscar contender
of the same
name, starring Massimo Troisi). The first is that it's a muddled but
occasionally-brilliant lampoon of epic motion pictures. The other is that it's
a horribly written, badly acted miscalculation of Ishtar-like proportions. If you take The Postman at face value - that it's a straightforward, post-
apocalyptic adventure tale, then it could seem like one of the worst movies of
the year, if not of all time. However, since I laughed so hard during some
scenes, I prefer to be a little kinder. Yes, it's a bad movie, but it's not one
of the most unbearable theatrical experiences of the year. In fact, if you
approach The Postman in the right
mood, it's a highly watchable motion picture.
Admittedly,
that's damning with faint praise, but I don't think The Postman is so gut- wrenchingly awful that it deserves ![]()
or less.
With all of its rampant jingoism, cliched melodrama, and shameless attempts at
emotional manipulation, The Postman
could easily be viewed as a clever satire of epic adventures. In fact, there
are times when it goes so far overboard that I found it virtually impossible to
believe that director Kevin Costner wasn't winking at us. Sadly, based in part
on the film's overall tone and in part on some of the director's comments, this
doesn't seem to be the case. Except in certain moments that are obviously
intended to be humorous, The Postman
is not supposed to be a joke. But intent isn't everything, as fans of campy
classics will point out. Regardless of what Costner wanted from the movie, it's
still possible to enjoy it on a completely different level.
Of
course, the running length is the real drawback. It's difficult to thrill to
the dissonant rhythms of an "entertainingly bad" movie that threatens
to drag for three hours. At half that length, The Postman might have been worth a recommendation, but, past
the two hour mark, all of the cheese and corn starts becoming painful. Plus, a
rather unfortunate attempt to add a message about consequences brings the movie
to a grinding halt. We want to see overblown acts of heroism to go along with
James Newton Howard's grandiose score and Stephen Windon's sweeping camerawork.
Instead, we get a little too much of Kevin Costner brooding.
This
side of a TV commercial, never has the U.S. Mail Service been so lauded (I
wonder if they paid a heavy product placement fee). On top of that, there's
such a cloying dose of patriotism that it's a wonder that Warner Brothers has
been able to sell the film overseas (of course, the foreign markets may view
all of the half-baked, pro-American slogans as one big joke). From a marketing
standpoint, the only thing The Postman
has going for it is the star, and his already-dipping stock is likely to take a
precipitous tumble after this movie hits screens across the world.
The film
opens in 2013 on the Great Salt Flats of Utah. In the aftermath of a
cataclysmic world war, the human race has been fragmented and scattered. The
government of the United States has collapsed, and now anarchy reigns. Small
communities across the remains of the country jealously protect what they have
by offering tribute to the dictatorial General Bethlehem (Will Patton), whose
army of bandits and murderers controls everything. Any settlement that defies
Bethlehem is quickly razed.
One day,
a solitary wanderer (Costner) enters a small town to present a one-man
Shakespeare show as a means of earning a little food and shelter. General
Bethlehem pays a surprise visit to this village and the nameless loner is
conscripted into the Holnist army. He is a rebellious man, however, and it
isn't long before he escapes. Fleeing from search parties, he hides out in an
old, broken down mail carrier's truck. Taking the full letterbag and the coat
off a skeleton, he becomes the Postman. And, as he travels from town-to-town,
speaking words of hope about the "Reformed Congress of the United
States" and giving out letters, his reputation spreads, and Bethlehem
determines that he's a threat.
Costner
has done everything possible to make this film a crowd-pleaser. There are
snappy one- liners, a romantic subplot for those who crave a little sex, and
several manipulative scenes that are designed to get audiences to applaud
wildly. Unfortunately, we're too busy laughing at all of the bloated silliness
to remember to clap. Take, for example, one of the film's most emotional
moments: a slow-motion shot of the Postman on horseback snatching a letter out
of the hand of an eager boy. The brief sequence is filmed with such solemnity
that it's all-but-impossible not to be amused, however briefly.
Costner
plays the Postman like a combination of John Dunbar from Dances with Wolves and the mariner from Waterworld.
It's not a particularly energetic or interesting performance, and it's made
even more tiresome by the hero's reluctance to act decisively (this wastes a
good forty-five minutes). As the villain, Will Patton is generic. He's neither
good nor bad, and doesn't bring much more to the part than we'd get from a
Dennis Hopper or a Gary Busey. Larenz Tate's character, Ford Lincoln Mercury,
is the stereotypical idealistic enthusiast, and Tate puts about as much energy
into the role as it deserves. The only legitimate spark is generated by
newcomer Olivia Williams, who plays Abby, the Postman's love interest. She's
quite good, and manages to develop an independent female character who's not
always in need of rescuing, but her above-average effort is wasted in this
material.
It's
hard to believe that the same man who directed a modern classic, Dances with
Wolves, could be responsible for something
this horribly mishandled. Where did it all go wrong? Probably at the very
beginning. The Postman is a bad
idea, poorly executed. The plot is dumb and riddled with gaping holes of logic,
and the dialogue sounds like it was penned by a hack writer. (One classic line:
Abby, addressing the Postman, says in a heartfelt voice, "You give out
hope like it was candy in your pocket." Puhleeze! Give me a break!) When
all is said and done, however, at least it can amuse us. And, even at an
interminable three hours, it still offers more solid laughs than half of this
year's so-called "comedies."
Review
by: James Berardinelli, Provided By: http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/p/postman97.html
pictures
provided by: http://images.google.com/images?q=single+popcorn+kernel&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=
and
http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=movie+popcorn
Life After the
Postman: the calm after the storm
After his heroic debut our postman decides the people of 2013 have lived in a harsh environment for far to long so he brings about the calm after the storm. He sends chain mail all throughout the world asking for people to save our planet. By the end of our sequel what started off as cleaning a tiny town turned into our small population cleaning the world. After all once you hit rock bottom the only place to go is up.
picture provided
by: http://images.google.com/images?q=calm&hl=en
Prevention of The Postman:
images taken
from:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.opinions-unlimited.com/images/Your%2520Opinion%2520Counts.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.opinions-unlimited.com/questionnaire.html&h=256&w=257&sz=26&tbnid=BeLXu2ohZvjdgM:&tbnh=106&tbnw=107&hl=en&start
Prevention of
the postman isn’t a simple task so many different people with different
opinions and views on the world and its societies so how can we prevent nuclear
warfare and or plain ole’ war? We can’t, but we can do everything in our power
to help persuade the radicals into submission. No matter what it takes people
getting hurt or hurting those people our world is to beautiful to destroy, were
on the verge of destruction. Today
is the age of nuclear weapons not muskets, We have all see the pictures of
mushroom clouds and the introduction of leukemia to many of the worlds children
from radiation unfortunately now a country who cant even handle a government
has access to weapons of mass destruction. It’s only a matter of time so, stand
up for our world and future lives that have yet to come. Make a difference.
Works Cited Page
18
Apr. 2006
<http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.txstickerco.com/images/Texas%2520Flags/Texas%2520Flag%2520FRONT.PNG&imgrefurl=http://www.txstickerco.com/&h=268&w=428&sz=77&tbnid=R-0yWlmiGUE2VM:&tbnh=76&tbnw=122&hl=en&start=5&prev=/images%3Fq%>.
18
Apr. 2006
<http://images.google.com/images?q=Nuclear+explosion&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&start=40&sa=N>.
18
Apr. 2006 <http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=flower>.
18
Apr. 2006 < http://images.google.com/images?q=the+postman&hl=en>.
18
Apr. 2006 <http://images.google.com/images?q=envelope&hl=en>.
Berardinell,
james. 18 Apr. 2006
<http://movie-reviews.colossus.net/movies/p/postman97.html>.
18
Apr. 2006
<http://images.google.com/images?q=single+popcorn+kernel&svnum=10&hl=en&lr=>.
18
Apr. 2006
<http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&q=movie+popcorn>.
18
Apr. 2006 <http://images.google.com/images?q=calm&hl=en>.
18 Apr. 2006
<http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.opinions-unlimited.com/images/Your%2520Opinion%2520Counts.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.opinions-unlimited.com/questionnaire.html&h=256&w=257&sz=26&tbnid=BeLXu2ohZvjdgM:&tbnh=106&tbnw=107&hl=en&start>.