CRITICAL ISSUES FORUM 2007
SPACE: FORUM FOR
COOPERATION OR NEXT FRONTIER FOR WMD PROLIFERATION?
BENCHMARK II
STUDENT: Dmitri Kuzmik
TEACHER: Olga Sergeyeva
SCHOOL FOR
COSMONAUTICS
ADVISOR: Elena Nekrasova
SIBERIAN YOUTH EDUCATIONAL
INFORMATION CENTER
ZHELEZNOGORSK 2007
Objective 1
1. A database of
the scientific and technical requirements to develop a space program
What does a country
need to start its own space program? We have tried to represent the the basic
components of a space program in the following chart:


Besides, there exist
some requirements to developing a space program which include security,
environmental, technological, medical and political aspects.
2. The benefits of
a space program to society
To begin with, the idea of humans departing
the planet into space has always been fascinating. Space exploration is very
important as science and technology benefited greatly from national space
programs. Space can produce a higher quality of life and more economic wealth.
Various fields of science advanced when man flew into space and to the Moon.
Astronomy books are rewritten every day thanks to Hubble Space Telescope,
International Ultraviolet Explorer and space probes. Computer Science made
great progress as smaller and faster computers were needed to send a man to the
Moon and this led to the microprocessor and our modern computers. Medicine
profited greatly from space programs. A serious problem of calcium loss in the
bones of astronauts has helped to study an earthbound skeletal disease, osteoporosis.
Perhaps a cure for cancer may someday come from experiments run in space. The
monitoring of our Earth from space came from space programs. The space
exploration missions have produced basic knowledge about our planet, our
environment, the solar system, and the universe. Space missions have given us a
deeper awareness of the history of our Earth and how we can make better
decisions concerning life on our planet and improve it for ourselves and for
the next generations. Applications from the space program have made life a
totally different experience than it was forty years ago. Nightly, we receive
live television news reports from all over the world. Every day we receive
accurate weather forecasts as meteorologists carefully examine a great number
of satellite photographs which show the latest storm systems and how they will
affect our future weather. Satellite hurricane prediction has saved many lives
in different parts of the world. This fact alone shows that space programs have
made a great contribution into the life of the humanity. Advanced space
technology, has made life on Earth more secure. Advances in electronics,
medicine, robotics, computers, miniaturization, and remote sensing have
occurred quickly because of the space program. If there had not been a space
program, these advances would have probably appeared much later if at all.
3. A list of
nations that have space programs
It is possible to
divide all space-faring nations (nations with a rocket powerful enough for
space launches which are capable to launch their own satellite into orbit) into
two groups: those that have performed human spaceflights and those that performed non-human
spaceflights.
|
Space programs with
human spaceflight |
Space programs with
non-human spaceflights |
|
People’s Republic of
China Russian Federation The United States of
America |
Argentina, Brazil,
Canada, Europe (ESA), France, Germany, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, Italy, India,
Japan, North Korea, South Korea,
Malaysia, Pakistan, Republic of China (Taiwan), Spain, Ukraine, United
Kingdom |
People’s Republic
of China – dual use space program
China’s space program goals include:
- setting up an
independent satellite telecommunications system
- establishing an
independent satellite navigation and positioning system
- providing commercial
launches
- setting up a remote
sensing system
- studying space
science
- Moon exploration
- constructing manned
space station
- performing manned missions to the moon
- constructing manned lunar base
Russian Federation
Russian space
program includes:
Developing new-generation spacecraft
for communications and navigation (both military and civilian),
United States – 50% military 50%
civilian program (dual use)
In the past the USA
had 5 manned programs and space shuttle. Each program had its own objectives.
Mercury project
(1961-1963) aimed at sending a man into orbit around the Earth, studying the
effects of being in space and returning safely to earth.
Gemini project
(1965-1966) aimed at spending up to two weeks in orbit, docking with another
spacecraft, perfecting earth re-entry and landing.
Apollo project
(1967-1972) aimed at landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to
earth, gathering lunar rocks and soil samples.
Skylab project
(1973-1979) aimed at proving that humans could live and work in space for
extended periods and expanding our knowledge of solar astronomy.
Apollo-Soyuz test project
aimed at safe docking of an Apollo spacecraft with a Soyuz spacecraft
[http://www.thespacerace.com]

Non-human
spaceflight
Argentina -
civilian space program
The national space
program provides for two satellite series devoted to earth observation (SAC and
SAOCOM) and international cooperation;
Brazil – civilian space program (former military)
Brazilian space
program goals include:
[http://www.brazilspace.com]
Canada – civilian space program
Canadian space program is aimed to promote the peaceful use and development of space for the benefits of Canadians and humanity, to contribute technology, expertise and personnel to the world space effort especially in collaboration with NASA and ESA.
European Space
Agency (17 member states) –
civilian space program
The program is dedicated to the
exploration of space (as an integral part of overall space activities),
commercial space launches (current market leader)

Indonesia – civilian and military space program
Iran
Research in the field of space and aero
technology, remote sensing and development of national and international
space technology and communication networks.
[http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran/missile/iris.htm]
Japan – dual use space program

India -
dual use space program
UK – civilian space program
The UK is going to
play the key role in ESA mission to the Moon (future ESA program ExoMars).
Active collaboration with NASA and ESA. Own space program goals include:
US-Soviet
competition in space
For over a
decade, the United States and the Soviet Union were involved in a fierce
competition—the space race. The space race began in 1957 when the Soviet
Union launched the first artificial satellite, Sputnik. The Russians have
accomplished a number of impressive space “firsts” including first
artificial satellite, first man in space, first woman in space, first
crafts to flyby Venus, Mars and the Moon, the world’s first space station
and many other firsts. The Soviet space program was 95% military. Every
rocket launch was conducted by the Strategic Rocket Forces and all
payloads had some military significance such as reconnaissance, weather
reporting, navigation, communications, and remote sensing. Initially, the
Soviet government considered its space program as a means to show to the
rest of the world the superiority of Communist system. In contrast to the
American space program the Soviet space program was very secretive. Both
programs were initially military (Russian – 95% military, American – 50%
military). The Soviet government trumpeted every single “frst” but the
world seldom heard of Russian failures. In contrast, the Americans made no
secret of their failures. Sergei Korolev,
Russian “Grand Designer” was a true space
pioneer, he wanted no fame, he just wanted to explore space. He set up a
very simple and methodical space exploration program. The American space
program was more sophisticated and technical. For instance, the Russians
used smaller and simpler rocket engines in several engine pods, but the
Americans designed a large complicated engine for their vehicles. The
Russians used batteries for electric power which lasted from 10 to 14 days
instead of sophisticated solar panels for their reconnaissance missions.
To keep constant reconnaissance, the Russians had to launch another
reconnaissance satellite every two weeks and led the world in launches for
25 years. While it seemed the
United States had captured the prime German experts, it turned out to be
the Soviets who managed to launch the first artificial Earth satellite.
[John F. Graham – From talisman of the past to gateway of the future. Chapter
20- Russian space programs1995. http://www.space.edu/projects/book/
]
1957 October 4 –
Sputnik 1 was sent to a 370 mile high orbit (USSR) Sputnik had been
launched on an ICBM booster rocket called R-7 from Baikonur in Russia.
Sergei Korolev led the team that developed it.
1957 November 3 –
Sputnik 2 carrying the dog, Laika, was launched in orbit (USSR)
1958 January 31 - Explorer 1 the first
successful American satellite reached orbit (USA)
1958 March 5 - Explorer 2 was launched
but it failed to reach orbit (USA)
1958 March 17 – The Vanguard 1
satellite was launched (USA)
1958 May 5 –
Sputnik 3, a geophysical lab, was launched (USSR)
1958 October
1 - The Congress
created NASA. (USA)
1959 January - Luna 1, the first spacecraft to escape Earth
orbit was launched (USSR)
1959 March 3 -
Pioneer 4 was launched in an Earth-Moon trajectory. It passed within
60,000 kilometers from the Moon (USA)
1959 May 28 – The
first primates completed a suborbital flight onboard Jupiter ballistic
missile (USA)
1959 September 12
– Luna 2 was launched. It impacted the Moon on September 13, the first
man-made object to do so. (USSR)
1959 October 4 –
Luna 3 orbited the Moon and photographed 70% of its surface. (USSR)
1960 April 1 –
Tiros 1 was launched from Cape Canaveral, the first weather monitoring
satellite (USA)
1960 April 13 –
Transit 1B, the first navigation satellite, was successfully launched.
(USA)
1960 May 15 – The
first prototype of Vostok spacecraft reached orbit (USSR)
1960 August 18 –
Discoverer XIV was launched, its first camera equipped spy satellite (USA)
1960 August 19 –
Two dogs Belka and Strelka became the first animals returning from orbit.
(USSR)
1961 February 12
– Venera 1 probe was launched towards Venus (USSR)
1961 April 12 –
Yuri Gagarin completed the world’s first manned spaceflight on board
Vostok spacecraft (USSR)
1961 May 5 – Alan
Shepard became the first American in space
1961 May 25 – The
US President John F. Kennedy addressed the Congress and challenged the
nation to go to the Moon before the end of the decade.
"I
believe this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before
this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely
to Earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive
to mankind, or more important in the long-range exploration of space; and
none will be so difficult or expensive to accomplish."
John F. Kennedy
Special Joint Session of Congress
1961 July 21 –
Gus Grissom was launched on a sub-orbital flight. His Liberty-Bell capsule
was lost when it filled with water and sank after splashdown.
1961 August 6 – German
Titov spent a day in space aboard Vostok 2 (USSR)
1962 February 20
– John Glenn orbited the Earth 3 times (the US first manned orbital space
flight) (USA)
1962 August 11-15
– Two manned spacecrafts Vostok 3 and 4 orbited the Earth simultaneously
(USSR)
1962 September 12
– President Kennedy gave a speech at Rice University reaffirming the
importance of the Moon program.
“We choose to
go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the
other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.”
1962 December 12
– Mariner 2 completed the first Venus flyby.
1963 June 16-19 –
Valentina Tereshkova became the first woman in space.
1963 April 8 - NASA launched an
unmanned Gemini-1 spacecraft on a first test mission of the program
1964 October 31 –
Astronaut
1965 March 18 –
Alexei Leonov conducted the world’s first spacewalk
1965 June 3 – Ed
White performed America’s first spacewalk.
1965 July 15 –
Mariner 4 completed flyby of Mars
1965 November 16 –
Venus 3 was launched. (the first man-made object to impact Venus on March
1, 1966)
1966 February 3 –
Luna 9 became the first spacecraft to soft -land on the Moon.
1966 April 3 –
Luna 10 became the first satellite to orbit the Moon.
1966 June 2 – Surveyor
1 soft-landed on the Moon
1967 January 27 –
Three US astronauts died in the fire inside Apollo spacecraft during
on-pad tests
1967 April 24 –
Vladimir Komarov died on landing during the test flight of Soyuz 1
spacecraft
1967 October 18 –
Venera 4 transmits data about the atmosphere of Venus
1968 March 27 –
Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin died in a plane crash.
1968 September 15
– Zond 5 became the first spacecraft to orbit the Moon and return to
Earth.
1968 October 11 –
The Apollo 7 with a crew of 3 orbited Earth
1968 December 21
– The Apollo 8 with a crew of 3 completed world’s first translunar flight
and orbiting of the Moon.
1969 January 16 -
Soyuz 4 and 5 performed the first spacecraft docking.
1969 July 20 –
The Apollo 11 astronauts landed and walked on the surface of the Moon.
[http://www.thespacerace.com]
By
reaching the moon first, the United States won the space race. The world
watched each country’s progress with great interest. Scientists and
government leaders in both countries were under intense pressure to meet
tough deadlines. [http://www.newseum.org]
In
spite of the fact that the space race was originally a competition between
two cold war enemies, it doubtlessly resulted in many benefits for the
people of the Earth.
We
were greatly impressed by a BBC-Russian TV series called “Space Race” showing success and failure of the two
nations efforts to win the competition in space. “Space Race” was first
shown in Britain in 2005, and it was dedicated to the 100th
anniversary of Sergei Korolev’s birth in Russia in 2007. It is a
docu-drama series chronicling the major events and characters in the
American – Soviet space race. It focuses on two major figures of Soviet
and American space programs – Sergei Korolev, the Soviets’ chief rocket
designer, and Wernher von Braun, his American rival. The events of the
first days of space exploration are depicted very vividly, we see the
sleepless nights, nerves, constant tension, failures and long-waited
success of these personalities and we feel the real atmosphere of those
days.
Episode 1 is
called “Race for Rockets” and covers the period from 1944 to 1949. We see
Wernher von Braun surrender to American troops and his move to the United
States. We see Sergei’s Korolev release from the Gulag, and how he is set
to work on Soviet rockets.
Episode 2 is
called “Race for Satellites” (1953-1958). Korolev designs and constructs
R-7 Smoke, a rocket capable of carrying a five-ton warhead to America.
Later Korolev was allowed to use it to launch Sputnik 1. After Vanguard
failure Von Braun is eventually allowed to launch Explorer1, the first
American satellite.
Episode 3 “Race
for Survival” (1959-1961) shows how both USSR and USA prepare to manned
space flight. Russia develops “Vostok program” while America develops
“Mercury project”. Both sides experienced great difficulties and failures
but the Russians succeeded in putting Yuri Gagarin into space first.
Americans put Alan Shepard into space shortly afterwards.
Episode 4 “Race
to the Moon” spans 1964-1969. Both countries have ambitious plans to put a
man on the Moon. The Americans pull ahead with their “Gemini project” but
suffer a disaster with Apollo 1 fire. Soviet space program suffers its own
tragedy – Sergei Korolev dies during an operation, the cosmonaut Vladimir
Komarov is killed during the crash of Soyuz landing and moon rocket N 1
fails to launch. Americans overcome the difficulties and perform the first
manned lunar mission and the first manned lunar landing.
One interesting
detail attracted our attention – Steve Nicolson, a British actor,
performed the role of Sergei Korolev. In our opinion his acting was
brilliant.
China and India space programs –
case studies
We have analyzed
the space programs of two Asian countries with biggest populations in the
world. India and China are now becoming major space-faring nations. Chinese
and Indian astronomers knew a lot about our solar system long before
Europeans. At present the economies of both countries show high growth
rates and are able to invest more and more money in national space
programs.
|
|
China |
India |
|
history |
A biological
rocket carrying rats was launched successfully from Anhui province on
July 19, 1964 The PRC
launched its first satellite Mao 1 on its “Long March” space rocket on
April 24, 1970. This launch made China the fifth nation with a space
rocket. In November
1975 China launched its first “homing satellite” and thus became the 3d
nation capable to do so. In 2003 China
became the 3d nation with human spaceflight program. |
First
Nike-Apache rocket launch in Thumba in 1963 led to the birth of India’s
space program (November 21, 1963) [V. M. Thomas –
India’s space program turns 40 – www.space.com
] In 1980 India
became the 8th country to launch a satellite into orbit. In 1984 the
first Indian cosmonaut became the 138th man in space. |
|
Goals |
China
astronauts spacewalk Moon and Mars
exploration (in cooperation with Russia) Independent
satellite navigation and positioning system Developing of
small satellites |
Domestic design,
production and launching of remote sensing and communications satellites [www.indianchild.com] |
|
spacecrafts |
Rockets The Long March
series of launch vehicles Long March 1
(1970) Long March 2
(1975) Long March 3
(1983) Long March 4
(1988) Weaver Girl Satellites Several
successful launches since 1970 Remote sensing,
communications and weather satellites for both civilian and military
use: Wind and Cloud
# 1 |
Rockets Satellite
launch vehicle (SLV) Augmented
Satellite Launch Vehicle (ASLV) Polar Satellite
Launch Vehicle (PSLV) Geosynchronous
Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) Satellites Aryabhata – the
first Indian space satellite Bhaskara I – an
Earth observation satellite Rohini 1 – first India’s own satellite Remote sensing
and communications satellites (Rohini 3 – television coverage from 20 to
70 % of the population) INSAT 1 and 2 –
geostationary communications and meteorological satellite GSAT 1
communications satellite with digital audio, data and video broadcasting Technology
Experiment Satellite (TES) Indian National
Satellite (INSAT 3C) |
|
missions |
Major lunar
exploration project – Chang’e project Launch services
to foreign countries since 1987 Science and
application satellites to develop remote areas of the country Human
spaceflights Human landing on
the Moon |
Moon flight
project (2007 – 2008) Own human
spaceflight – India is planning to become the 4th nation with
human spaceflight and to send a man into orbit in 2014 and a man to the
Moon in 2020. Commercial
launches |
|
Agencies |
China National
Space Administration Ministry of
Astronautics (rocketry) Chinese Academy
of Space Technology (CAST) China Great
Wall Industry Corporation (commercial launches) |
Indian Space
Research Organization (ISRO) became
Government organization on April 1, 1975 A Space Science
and Technology Center (SSTC) Department of
Space (DOS) |
|
astronauts |
In 2003 Yang
Liwei became the first Chinese man in space. He spent 21.5 hours in orbit on board Shenzhou 5 spacecraft
In 2005 Fei
Junlong and Nie Haisheng spent 5 days in orbit on board Shenzhou 6. |
In 1984 the
first Indian cosmonaut on board became the 138th man in
space. |
|
spaceports |
4 major launch
sites: Jiuquan,
Taiyuan, Xichang, Hainan |
Satish Dhawan
Space Center Thumba
Equatorial Rocket Launch Center Balasore Sriharikota |
|
budget |
2006 - $ 2575
billion and from year
to year China’s space budget is growing rapidly [www.cns.miis.edu/research/space/] |
2005-2006 $ 722
million (24% increase) 2006-2007 $ 815
million (35 % increase) India’s space
program is already a money earner. India sells infrared images from its
remote-sensing satellites to other countries. [http://space.com/spacenews/archive] [http://www.newscientist.com] |
Both countries
are believed to become space superpowers and have ambitious plans to
explore space. The countries have their own space centers as well as
launching capabilities. The space programs of the countries started almost
simultaneously but nowadays China
has greater
technological potential and capabilities. This is proved by the fact that
China has become the third country in the world with manned spaceflight.
The budget of India’s space program is relatively modest comparing to
China’s. Both countries have dual use space programs.
Objective 2
Treaties and agreements that govern
uses of space
Through the
efforts of the United Nations Committee on the peaceful uses of Outer
space and its legal subcommittee a number of significant contributions to
the law of outer space have been made. The United Nations has become a
focal point for international cooperation in outer space and for the
formulation of necessary international laws.
[United Nations
Treaties and Principles on Outer Space – www.unoosa.org]
There are five
general multilateral treaties which regulate activities in outer
space
The Outer Space Treaty (Treaty on Principles Governing the
Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including
the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies)
97 parties,
27 signatories
Adopted by
the General Assembly on 19 December 1966, opened for signature on 27
January 1967 in Moscow, Washington, D.C. and London, entered into force on
10 October 1967
o Bans weapons of mass destruction in orbit,
on celestial bodies, or stationed in space in any way.
o Bans military installations or
fortifications and weapons testing on celestial bodies.
o Bans claiming ownership of territory in
space and on celestial bodies.
o Requires prior notification in case of
planned harmful activities in space.
Agreement on
the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of
Objects Launched into Outer Space (Rescue Treaty)
Adopted by the
General Assembly on 19 December 1967, opened for signature on 22 April
1968 in London, Moscow and Washington D.C.
Convention of
International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (The Liability Convention)
82 ratifications,
25 signatories.
Adopted on 29
November 1971, opened for signature on 29 March 1972, entered into force
on 1 September 1972.
o
Requires
that a state pay compensation for any damage its space objects cause to
another state’s space assets on Earth, in flight, or in space.
Convention on
Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space (The Registration Convention)
44 parties, 4
signatories
Adopted on 12
November 1974, opened for signature on 14 January 1975, entered into force
on 15 September 1976.
Agreement
Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and other Celestial Bodies (The Moon Agreement)
10 parties, 5
signatories
Adopted on 5
December 1979, opened for signature on 18 December 1979, entered into
force on 11 July 1984
o Bans weapons of mass destruction on, in
orbit around, or on a trajectory around the Moon.
o Bans military installations, fortifications
and weapons testing on the Moon.
o Requires that the exploration and
exploitation of natural resources on the Moon be carried out for the
benefit and interest of all countries irrespective of their degree of
economic or scientific development.
There is also
a The Limited Test Ban treaty (1963) which is considered as one of the
major space treaties in some sources.
The Limited
Test Ban treaty (1963)
131 parties, 64
signatories
Forbids the test explosion of any nuclear weapons in outer space,
the atmosphere, and under water.
The 1967 Outer
Space Treaty can be viewed as a general legal basis for the peaceful uses
of outer space. The four other treaties may be said to deal specifically
with certain concepts included in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty.
[United Nations Treaties and Principles on
Outer Space – www.unoosa.org ]
Today, due to the
fact that many countries have indigenous launch capabilities as well as
civilian, military and commercial space programs, the legitimacy of any
space arms control norm depends on the buy-in of the major space-faring
nations.
In the
following chart we state the position of the countries with space programs
concerning 5 major space treaties.
|
Country |
OST |
ARRA |
LIAB |
REG |
MOON |
|
Russian Federation |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
USA |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
China |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
India |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
|
Korea |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
Canada |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
Germany |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
France |
R |
R |
R |
R |
S |
|
Great Britain |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
Brazil |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
|
Argentina |
R |
R |
R |
R |
|
|
ESA |
|
D |
D |
D |
|
R - ratification,
accession or succession; S
- signature only; D
- declaration of acceptance of rights and obligations
[Status of
International Agreements Relating to activities in Outer Space as at 1
January 2006 – http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/SpaceLaw/treatystatus]
In addition,
there are five relevant General Assembly resolutions:
ü The Declaration of Legal Principles
Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Uses of Outer
Space (1963)
ü The Declaration of International
Cooperation in the Exploration in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space
for the Use and Benefit and in the Interests of All States (1996)
ü The Principles Governing the Use by States
of Artificial Earth Satellites for International Direct Television
Broadcasting (1982)
ü The Principles Relevant to the Use of
Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space (1992)
ü The Principles Relating to Remote Sensing
of the Earth from Outer Space (1986)
[Jonathan Dean –
Defenses in Space: Treaty Issues. Future Security in Space: Commercial,
Military, and Arms Control Trade-Offs. Occasional Paper No.10]
Besides, there
exist bilateral treaties between the United States and Russia
Strategic Arms
Reduction Treaty (START) I (1991)
o
Forbids
interference with satellite treaty verification measures.
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty (1987)
o
Forbids
interference with satellite treaty verification measures.
Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (1972)
o
Prohibits
the development of nation-wide defenses against long-range missiles.
o
Bans the
development, testing, or deployment of space-based missile defense
components.
Strategic Arms Limitations Talks (SALT) I Interim Agreement
(1972)
o
Allows
the use of satellites (national technical means of verification) for
treaty verification and forbids interference with these satellites.
[CNS – Space: Major Treaties and Membership - http://cns.miis.edu/research/space/treaties/]
Since June 13, 2002, when U.S. withdrawal from ABM Treaty became
effective, there is no longer a treaty prohibition against testing or
deploying weapons in space other than weapons of mass destruction.
We have analyzed
some articles to research what scientific and technological resources are
needed to monitor and verify compliance with any space treaties. At a
recent annual Conference on Disarmament, China stated: “Due to the complex
nature of verification of outer space activities, which bears on the
security interest of all countries, as well as to technical and financial
constraints of verification, currently it is extremely difficult to
negotiate a verification provision. For the time being, to put on hold the
verification issue until conditions are ripe, and to negotiate a treaty
without verification provisions could be a practical alternative.” [http://www.thespacereview.com/article/744/1]
It should be mentioned that today there is an urgent need to add
several amendments to Outer space Treaty (1967) banning weapons of any
kind (kinetic weapons,
lasers) in space. The Outer space treaty can’t be considered 100%
effective without these amendments. [http://www.cosmosravelin.narod.ru]
V. Kruglov and S. Dymov in their article on weapons in space [http://www.rian.ru/analytics]
say that today it is unclear how to monitor and verify compliance
with Outer Space Treaty and therefore prevent militarization and weaponization
of space. The idea of nuclear terrorism in space in the nearest future is
highly possible and may cause unpredictable consequences. The problem of
nonproliferation could be solved with the help of special devices put into
spacecrafts and able to control nuclear weapons in space. The necessity to
create a special program aiming to control nuclear weapons in orbit with
the help of some space-based devices was underlined by Vladimir Putin and
some American representatives. This program was called “a platform for
Russian-American cooperation in space”. Today the technological potential
of both countries makes it possible to create special inspecting
spacecrafts able to detect presence or absence of nuclear weapons in
orbit. It should be done in international cooperation with other
countries.
[E.P.Velikhov – Space-based weapons: Dilemma of Safety]
Objective 3
A listing of
space-based defenses
A space-based system actually includes three parts: a ground
segment (including telemetry, tracking and control facilities,
communications earth station and/or data reception and archival facilities
); the space segment itself (artificial satellites consisting of payloads
and platforms), and the radio links (uplinks/downlinks that carry
commands, communication traffic, signals, telemetry and data).
Space-based Ballistic Missile Defense systems can be lower-tier
(LT) and upper-tier (UT). They have different characteristics:
Lower-tier systems are endo-atmospheric, defend a small
area, intercept missiles with ranges less than 1000 km and generally are
used for force-protection purposes.
Upper-tier systems are exo-atmospheric, defend an area far
larger than lower-tier systems, use a completely different interceptor
able to maneuver outside the atmosphere, and defend against missiles with
ranges up to 4000-5000 km. Both types of systems are necessary because
lower-tier systems have very limited capabilities against longer-range
missiles, while some exo-atmospheric upper-tier systems cannot intercept
shorter-range missile. [ ]
Future defenses
The Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) is a consolidated system intended to meet
United States infrared space surveillance needs through the first two to
three decades of the 21st century. The SBIRS program addresses critical
warfighter needs in the areas of missile warning, missile defense and
battlespace characterization. SBIRS is an integrated "system of
systems" that will include satellites in geosynchronous orbit (GEO)
and low Earth orbit (LEO), sensors hosted on satellites in highly
elliptical orbit (HEO) and ground data processing and control. SBIRS
ground software integrates infrared sensor programs of the U.S. Air Force
(DSP) with new IR sensors.
[www.spacedebate/definitions/spacebasedinfraredsystem]
The Space-Based Laser – a gigantic orbiting laser which
destroys warheads by melting parts.
[Ballistic
Missile Defense - http://igcc.ucsd.edu/cprograms/]
Space-Based Radar (SBR) – is a proposed constellation of
active radar satellites for the United States Department of Defense. The
SBR system would allow detection and tracking of aircraft, ocean-going
vessels, and potentially land vehicles from space. This information would
then be relayed to regional and national command centers. [http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com]
Space-Based
interceptor (SBI) – is designed to accelerate towards and collide with a
ballistic missile as it passes through space at the top of its trajectory.
(Brilliant pebbles)
A time-line of the development of
space-based defenses
September 1944 – Germany starts using A-4 ballistic
missiles for attacks against London.
1953 – The Soviet Union initiated its ABM
development program.
1957 - US begins work on its first major
missile defense effort, the Nike-Zeus system.
1961 - According to one report, the Soviets
completed the first interception and destruction of a missile warhead.
1962. After technology flaws doom the
Nike-Zeus project, the US begins work on the Nike X missile defense
program, which uses nuclear-tipped interceptors.
1966 – The Soviet tests involved launching a
military missile from Kazakhstan to place a nuclear bomb in a very low
orbit around Earth (Fractional Orbit Bombardment System)
1966. US Defense Secretary McNamara
announces that the Soviet Union has deployed its Galosh missile defense
system.
September
1967. President
Johnson announces plans to deploy the Sentinel missile defense system (a
successor to the Nike X program).
March 1969 – US Safeguard system is given a start
for deployment.
May 1972. US and Soviet Union sign the ABM
Treaty, banning nationwide missile defenses and limiting each side to two
missile defense sites with no more than 100 interceptors at each site.
January 1976. The full Congress approves shutting
down Safeguard, and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announces the
system’s termination.
March 23,
1983. President
Reagan announces that the US will start an expanded research and
development program of missile defense system which makes "nuclear
weapons impotent and obsolete." His idea becomes the "Strategic
Defense Initiative," or SDI. Opponents call it "Star Wars."
October 1986. President Reagan and Soviet
President Gorbachev discuss the complete elimination of nuclear weapons,
but the proposal collapses when Reagan refuses to agree to limitations on
SDI.
June 14, 1989. President Bush decides to continue
the SDI program, but focus on the development of "Brilliant
Pebbles," a space-based interceptor design.
July 31, 1989. Presidents Bush and Gorbachev sign
START I, reducing arsenals to 6,000 deployed warheads on each side.
May 1990 – North Korea test launches the Nodong 1
ballistic missile into the sea of Japan.
July 1990 – Taiwan is developing a sophisticated air
defense system
November 1990 – The US establishes a Theater
Missile Defense System
1991 – The U.S. proposes the Missile Defense Act
1991 – Theater Missile Defense Initiative
projects are grouped into 3 groups
January 29,
1991. President Bush
announces the Global Protection against Limited Strikes (GPALS) system to
counter unauthorized, accidental or limited attacks.
February 1991. During the Persian Gulf War, the US
Patriot missile attempts to intercept Iraqi Scud attacks. Despite initial
glowing reports from the Pentagon, a study by the General Accounting
Office shows that only 9 percent of intercept attempts were reliably
successful.
February 1991 – Japan purchases one battery of
Patriot SAMs as part of its 1991-1995 defense plan.
1992 – The Bush Administration first proposes
Japanese and South Korean Theater Missile Defense deployments.
August 1992 – The U.S. and south Korean began
the joint exercise “Ulchi Focus Lens” which includes missile defense
exercises linking supercomputers in the US and Europe to command centers
in Korea.
January 3, 1993. Presidents Bush and Yeltsin sign
START II, limiting deployed warheads on each side to 3,000-3,500.
1993 – U.S. and Japanese industries jointly
conduct the Western Pacific Architecture studies.
1993 – The U.S. Congress states that it is a
national priority of the United States to develop and deploy highly
effective theater missile defense systems.
January 1993 – CIA Director Robert Gates confirms
that China obtains Patriot anti-missile technology.
March 1993 – China purchased at least 100 S-300
air-defense missiles from Russia.
May 1993 – A consortium of South Korean companies is
going to build the Russian Almaz ATBM system under license, as a defense
against North Korean Scud missiles.
March 21,
1997. Presidents
Clinton and Yeltsin agree to a START III framework.
September 26,
1997. The US and
Russia agree that the ABM Treaty includes Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.
17 Oct 97 The U.S. Army test-fired the Mid-Infrared
Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL) at an old Air Force satellite. The laser
fired two bursts at the satellite, one for less than a second and a second
one for about ten seconds. Neither the satellite's laser camera that was
the target of the firing, nor the satellite was damaged in the test.
July 1998. A commission chaired by Donald
Rumsfeld (now secretary of defense) finds that the threat of a ballistic
missile attack could emerge sooner than predicted in the 1995 intelligence
estimate. Many experts criticize the commission, however, for emphasizing
what could happen
rather than what was likely to happen.
August 31,
1998. North Korea
launches a Taepo Dong 1 missile over Japan, but the third stage fails to
put its payload in orbit.
July 23, 1999. President Clinton signs the National
Missile Defense Act of 1999, but lists four criteria he will use to make
an ultimate deployment decision: threat, cost, technological status of
NMD, and adherence to a renegotiated ABM Treaty.
September 1,
2000. President
Clinton decides not to proceed with deployment of the NMD system, citing
the status of technology and concerns among the US allies and opposition from
Russia and China. He defers an ultimate deployment decision to the next
administration.
January 2001. President Bush affirms his plan to
deploy a robust NMD system. Russian President Putin warns the US that the
ABM Treaty bans NMD systems on both sides.
June 2001. The White House FY02 defense budget
calls for a 57 percent increase for missile defense, up $3 billion to $8.3
billion.
June 16, 2001. First Bush-Putin summit in Slovenia.
Although a cordial meeting, the two leaders fail to reach concrete agreements
on missile defense and the ABM Treaty.
June 13, 2002 – The U.S. withdrew from ABM Treaty.
October 2006 – New U.S. National Space Policy
[Missile Defense
Timeline – Early History of Missile Defense – http://www.ucsusa.org]
Compare and contrast “space weapons” and “space-based defenses”
'Space weapons' are weapons that can: *attack
and negate the capability of space systems in orbit (i.e. anti-satellite
weapons) *attack targets on the earth (i.e. orbital bombardment weapons)
*defeat missiles traveling through space (i.e. elements of the ongoing
U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative program)
Anti-satellite weapons, which are primarily surface-to-space and air-to-
space missiles, have been developed by the United States, the USSR/Russia,
and the People's Republic of China. Some test firings have been successful
in destroying orbiting satellites.
On March 23 1983, President Ronald Reagan proposed the Strategic Defense
Initiative, a defensive system which would destroy enemy ICBMs. The
defensive system was nicknamed Star Wars, after the movie. The system was
intended to consist of satellites in geosynchronous orbit carrying
powerful lasers. When a missile launch was detected, the satellite would
fire its laser at the missile and destroy it. Although the satellites
never took off the ground, today the military is testing the use of lasers
mounted on Boeing 747s to destroy missiles. The tests are taking place at
Edwards Air Force Base. [http://www.spacedebate.org/
definitions]
“Space-based defense” – The Space Based Missile Defense includes
systems under development or studied to provide space based defenses
against ballistic missiles. Space based defenses provide an opportunity to
intercept ballistic missiles during the mid-course phase of their flight. It
works rather simple – when the ballistic missile is launched, it is
getting up into the outer space, space-based sensors detect an object
headed for the country. The information is relayed to ground-based
infrared sensors and radar systems, which also follow the object’s
trajectory, and it is stroked by the missile from the earth, if the object
is identified as a missile. It is done only in space, when the missile is
active and radars can find it. Military officials describe the process as
trying to hit a bullet with another bullet.
As simple as the system may seem,
it would be one of the most complex weapons ever designed. And until only
recently, many tests of the technology have failed.
ISS – international cooperation
The International Space Station is a
multi-purpose international facility for scientific research, development
of advanced technologies and stimulating commercial activities in space.
It orbits around the Earth at an altitude of 360km. The construction of
this beneficial satellite was a joint effort, bringing together the
resources of NASA, the Russian Federal Space Agency, the Japan Aerospace
Exploration Agency, the Canadian Space Agency and the European Space
Agency. During the early 1980s, the United States planned for the NASA
International Space Station to be a counterpart for the Soviet stations
Salyut and Mir, but construction was never implemented. The resolution of
the Cold War and the end of the race to space triggered international
efforts to rekindle the project. [http://www.space.com]
Today the present structure of the
International Space Station is half-Russian, half-American. Right now an international
consortium is building the ISS. The coming two years should see the
addition of two new modules to the ISS – a European and a Japanese one.
The ferry service will be provided by Russia with the help of the Soyuz
capsule. [http://www.ruvr.ru/news/scienceandtechnology]
The International Space
Station is much more than just a research facility; it is an “exciting”
city in space with an international crew and ground support group. It will
contribute a lot to international cooperation in space.
Objective
4
The need
for more open communications about the use of space
Space is
something that does not belong to any country or nation. Space is an
absolutely unique phenomenon which belongs to everyone on our planet.
Citizen of any country has the right to benefit from space. Space offers
great prospects for scientific research and technological development. But
in reality military programs of some countries envision space as a future
battlefield. Space military operations are usually highly secretive, new
kinds of space weapons are being developed but as a matter of fact average
people know nothing about it. A country’s actions in space should be
regulated not only by international space laws and agreements but also by
a public opinion. Space issues must be open for everybody, not hidden from
people’s interest.
There are a
lot of questions of space security that interest us.
Ø If the US is considered the leading
space-faring nation, why does it spend so much money and resources on its
defense needs?
Ø Is Russia considered to be among the
countries which preserve potential danger to the US in space?
Ø Is it possible for terrorist groups
to put nuclear weaponry in orbit? If yes, what is the possibility?
Ø What terrorist groups have enough
resources to do so?
Ø What organizations are responsible
for maintaining security in space?
Ø If any of the State Parties violates
the space law, what will be the punishment?
Bibliography
1 James Clay Moltz – Future Security in
Space: Commercial, Military, and Arms Control Trade-Offs. Monterey
Institute of International Studies, 2002
2 David Wright,
Laura Grego and Lisbeth Gronlung – The Physics of Space Security. A Reference
Manual.
3 United Nations
Treaties and Principles on Outer Space – http://www.unoosa.org
4 National space
programs – http://www.en.wikipedia.org
5 The U.S. space
projects – http://www.thespacerace.com/programs
6 Trends and
directions in space in 2007 – http://www.russianspaceweb.com/
7 V.M. Thomas -
India’s space program turns 40 – http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/india
8 India: Launch
capabilities – http://cns.miis.edu/research/space/india
9 India Space
Program – http://www.indianchild.com
10 India in
Space, China in Space – http://www.spacetoday.org/
11 Iran space
program – http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran
12 Brazil in
Space – http://www.brazilspace.com
13 John F. Graham
From Talisman of the Past to Gateway of the Future. – http://www.space.edu
14 The Space Race
– http://www.newseum.org
15 China in Space
– http://www.newscientist.com
16 E.P. Velikhov
– Space-based weapons: Dilemma of Safety (In Russian)
17 Space Weapons-
http://www.spacedebate.org/definitions
18 Ballistic
Missile Defense – http://www.igcc.ucsd.edu
20 Missile
Defense Timeline – http://www.ucsusa.org
21 http://www.thespacereview.com/article
22 Space-Based
Radar – http://www.encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com
23 http://www.rian.ru/analytics